A cautionary word on the meaning of “evidence”

When writing reports I am always very careful about using the word “evidence”.  A colleague once recounted a story to me about an experience he had in court in the early stages of his career.  He had used the word “evidence” in his report when talking about what he had found during his examinations at the laboratory.  The judge leaned towards him and said “Young man, it is not for you to tell the Court what is evidence.  Evidence is what I allow to be heard by the jury in my courtroom.  Until I allow it to be heard and accepted in my courtroom, what you have in your report are scientific findings and nothing more.”

The moral of the story is: don’t presume that what you have written will be accepted as evidence.  It’s only evidence if it is accepted as such by the Judge.  A scientist’s findings are exactly that – their findings.  Oh, and never upset the judge – not a wise move whatever way one looks at it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: